The 6146 / 6883 Family of Tubes

6146 Main Page

6883 Main Page

6883B Main Page

Beam Power Pentode

______________________________________________________________________________________________

The 6146 Family of Tubes
by
Glen E. Zook, K9STH
Copyright 2002 by author

Probably the most used tube of all times in the final amplifier of "boat anchor"
transmitters is the 6146. From the early 1950s until at least the 1980s, the 6146
found its way into virtually every manufacturer's line of transmitters. In fact,
during the early 1960s RCA had a series of advertisements on the back cover of
QST that listed a different manufacturer's equipment that used the 6146 each
month. A copy of the January 1960 QST advertisement featuring the Hallicrafters
HT-37 is included with this article.

There are actually three distinctive variants of the basic 6146: The 6146, 6146A,
and 6146B. It is unfortunate that the 6146B was called the 6146B for it is really a
different tube from the first two. Primarily the difference between the "plain" 6146
and the 6146A is the makeup of the heater ("filament"). The 6146A has what
RCA calls the "dark heater". This "dark heater" is supposed to be more resilient
to vibration, work well at a larger "range" of voltage, etc. Otherwise, the 6146 and
the 6146A are the same tube.

In mid-1964 RCA introduced the 6146B with the "claim" of 33.33 percent higher
power input than the 6146 / 6146A. Also, it was "claimed" that the 6146B could
be directly substituted for the earlier tubes. The 6146 / 6146A had a maximum
rated power input of 90 watts for CW and SSB operation and the 6146B had a
rating of 120 watts for the same emissions. You can see this in the attached copy
of their ad from the September 1964 issue of QST.

Many amateurs are aware that the military "ruggedized" version was designated
the 6146W (I will get to these tubes a bit later). However, RCA also introduced in
the early 1960s the 8298 tube for use in commercial mobile equipment. The 8298
is just a "heftier" 6146A. Motorola, General Electric, and quite a number of other
commercial FM equipment manufacturers used these tubes in all sorts of FM
communications equipment for both low band (30-50 MHz) and high band
(150.8 - 172 MHz). When the 6146B was introduced, RCA "announced" the 8298A
commercial equivalent of the 6146B. In fact, most of the RCA 6146B tubes were
"cross branded" with the 8298A number in addition to the 6146B.

Those companies who were manufacturing 6146 series tubes for the military
changed from the "plain" 6146 to the 6146A to the 6146B as the military decreed.
However, all of the tubes manufactured under military contracts were known as
6146W and, to my knowledge, nothing was done towards marking the tubes as
being equivalents of the 6146, 6146A, or 6146B. The only way of telling is from
the "date code" which is printed on each tube. Different manufacturers changed
tube types at different times. Also, I know of no "master list" telling on what date
a particular manufacturer changed from the 6146 to the 6146A to the 6146B. The
only "sure" way to know if a particular 6146W is of either the 6146 or 6146A type
is to look for a "code date" of before 1964 since RCA introduced the 6146B in the
middle of that year. However, some manufacturers did not start manufacturing
6146B equivalent 6146W tubes for at least a year after RCA introduced the 6146B.

RCA "claimed" that the 6146B was directly interchangeable with the earlier
members of the 6146 family. Unfortunately, this did not hold true in most cases.
Collins, Heath, and probably other companies, at first issued various documents
saying that the use of the 6146B in their equipment was "fine". But, this soon
proved otherwise!

For example, when the 6146B was used in the Collins 32S-1, 32S-2, 32S-3,
32S-3A, KWM-2, and KWM-2A it was discovered that the components in the
neutralization circuitry "burned up" in a very short amount of time. Thus, Collins
had to retract the statement that it was "OK" to use the 6146B. Then, due to the
fact that the United States military establishment wanted to "standardize" on the
6146W equivalent of the 6146B, the neutralization components had to be
redesigned to allow the 6146B to be used. Fortunately, these changes did not
affect the use of the earlier 6146 and 6146A in those transmitters manufactured
to use the 6146B. All three types of tubes may be used without any problem in
these transmitters.

Replacing the 6146 / 6146A tubes with 6146B types often results in spurious
emissions, parasitic oscillations, etc. This is due to the fact that there are different
bias requirements, different inter-electrode capacitances, etc. of the 6146B
versus the other two. It is often difficult to neutralize 6146B tubes when used in
place of the 6146 / 6146A. If neutralization can be achieved, often it lasts for just
a few minutes before the tube(s) goes into oscillation.

If one insists on trying the 6146B tubes in place of the 6146 / 6146A types, the
very first thing to do is to neutralize the final amplifier. If it will not neutralize, then
the 6146B tubes should immediately be replaced with the older type tubes. If it
does neutralize, then the neutralization should be "watched" for several hours
(even days) of operation. If the neutralization changes, then the 6146B tubes
again should be replaced with the 6146 / 6146A series. If the neutralization
remains constant after several days, then use of the 6146B is fine in that
particular transmitter.

I have, in my shack, a number of transmitters that use the 6146 / 6146A type of
tubes. These include Collins 32S-1, 32S-3 (earlier model before the
neutralization was changed); Heath Apache, DX-100, DX-35, SB-401, SB-110,
Seneca; Johnson Pacemaker; and other transmitters as well. Every one of these
is much "happier" with the 6146 / 6146A family of tubes. In addition, I have
owned transmitters like the Knight T-150 and T-150A that use the 6146 tubes.
Frankly, these transmitters were much happier with the 6146 / 6146A tubes.

There is another 6146 family tube that is "superior" for operation at least through
10 meters. That is the 6293. This tube was designed for "pulse" service and is
rated at 1-Kilowatt pulse power input. The primary difference between these and
the "normal" 6146 is that the plate is much "heavier" in its construction. Back in
the late 1950s and early 1960s we would almost "kill" to get our hands on a pair
of these for our DX-100s, etc. The 6293 outlasts the 6146 in "normal" service by
at least 5 times and often more than 10 times the life of the tube. These tubes
"show up" at hamfests, swap meets, etc., from time-to-time. If you see some of
these, definitely "glomp" onto them!

The 12-volt equivalent of the 6146 is the 6883, the equivalent of the 6146A is the
6883A, and the 6146B is the 6883B. Now, there are the tubes that were
manufactured for FM commercial service. These series go as follows: 6883,
6883A / 8032, 6883B / 8032A / 8552. Again most of these are "cross branded"
with all of the tube numbers that are equivalent.

From 1970 until late 1979 when Motorola went out of the reconditioned
equipment business, I owned the Motorola reconditioned equipment center for
the south-central United States. We reconditioned Motorola FM equipment for 14
states, everything that Motorola sold reconditioned that was exported, and
everything that was sold to the United States Government (this was the height of
Viet Nam and the Government did buy reconditioned equipment!).

At that time, the Motrac series of mobile equipment was very popular. Depending
on the model, these normally used one, or two, of the 6883A / 8032 tubes. It was
only in the very "latest" models (HHT "E" series, LHT series, and MHT series)
that Motorola had redesigned the equipment to use the 6883B / 8032A / 8552
tubes. Around late 1976 or early 1977, Motorola decided to eliminate some of the
tube types that they were "stocking" at the Schamburg, Illinois, parts depot. Thus,
they started shipping 8552 tubes in boxes that were marked as 8032. The Motrac
is unique in the fact that you cannot see the tubes when they are in operation
(they are enclosed in a metal "heat sink"). In fact, it is difficult to even "tune" a
Motrac when the heat sink is not in place.

We went through from 50 to over 100 of the 8032 type tubes per week and within
days were "down" to using the 8552 tubes in the 8032 boxes. Within a very few
days of starting to use the 8552 tubes we started receiving complaints that
virtually every Motrac unit that was received by customers arrived with one, or
both, tubes broken. Prior to this we had never had a single complaint. Upon
investigation we found that the 8552 tubes had so many parasitic oscillations that
they were getting so hot that the glass envelope was being annealed! This was
happening within a minute, or two, of tune-up and final quality control. When the
radio was subjected to normal vibrations of shipping, the glass envelope of the
tubes was being shattered.

This was reported to Motorola. At first they refused to believe us saying that we
must have gotten a "bad" shipment of tubes. But, within a couple of weeks they
received over 1000 complaints from their service stations about exactly the same
problem. It cost Motorola one "heck of a lot" of money to pay the warranty claims
because they had tried to "cut costs" by eliminating the earlier type of tube. They
had to re-box all of the 8552 tubes that had been put into 8032 boxes and get in
a "rush" shipment of 8032 tubes.

The whole problem stemmed from the fact that the "B" series of tubes is not the
same as the "plain" and "A" series. The parasitic oscillations were caused by the
different bias requirements and by the "fixed" neutralization of the driver and/or
amplifier tube in the Motrac. There was no practical way to change the circuitry to
handle the "B" series tubes. Also, making such a change would void the "type
acceptance" of the units.

In a "practical" sense, it is "OK" to mix 6146 and 6146A tubes since the primary
difference is in the design of the heaters. But, NEVER mix 6146 / 6146A tubes
with a 6146B! This is really "asking for trouble".

Also, in a number of transmitters and transceivers (especially the Heath SB-Line)
the heaters ("filaments") of the pair of 6146 tubes are in series. In these units it is
very easy to change the heaters from series to parallel and substitute the
6883 / 6883A / 8032 tubes. The 12-volt equivalent tubes are often available for
"pennies" because of the vast number that were used in the commercial FM
market. I have done this with my Heath SB-110A and it works "like a champ". If
you every want to change back, it is a very simple operation to do so.

I know that there are amateurs who say that they have used the 6146B tubes in
place of the 6146 / 6146A without any problems. I can definitely believe that. But,
I have seen way too many examples of the 6146B causing problems in relation to
the cases in which the substitution has no effect. As I said before, neutralize and
keep checking the neutralization for several days if you do replace your
6146 / 6146A tubes with 6146B types. Otherwise, you can find yourself with TVI,
"burned out tubes", and other damage to your transmitter.

You must be VERY careful when dealing with the various tubes of the 6146
family, otherwise you just might be in for some very interesting problems.
Substitute if you must, but, be aware that you are "treading on thin ice".

6293 vs 6146

Dated June 17, 2017

I was going through my tube caddy (cardboard box) and pulled 2 tubes which I thought were 6146's but they are 6293's. I said to myself, where did I get these and they look exactly like a 6146, overall size and internal construction. The specs on both tubes are virtually identical yet the 6293 is designed as a "Pulse Modulator" with up to 3,000 volts and 2 amps on the plate albeit for only microseconds. All other electrical parameters such as interelectrode capacitances are identical. So two questions. Because of the specs, I believe I use this in a 6146 circuit and secondly, what is special or what is different in the construction of the 6293 that makes it able to withstand the stresses of pulse duty and NOT the 6146 family of tubes?

Heavy duty version, preferred over the 6146...

Yes I know but what in its construction makes it heavy duty vs the 6146 ????

Seriously, if it can be used in HV pulse applications at 3kV they may pull a better vacuum on them, which "might" require special techniques, maybe even thicker glass. I really don't know. I don't think any of these are American-made anymore, so cherish the old stuff you have.

The 6293, generally, has a thicker plate than the 6146A of which it is a variant. They definitely make excellent replacements for the 6146A and, when run at the specifications for the 6146A, they can last up to like 10-times longer than the 6146A.
The 6293 is rated at a maximum of 1000-watts peak pulse input power.

Back in the 1950s and well into the 1960s, amateur radio operators would almost "kill" to get 6293 tubes to run our DX-100, TX-1 Apache, Ranger, Valiant, B&W 5100, and other transmitters that used the 6146 or 6146A / 8298 tubes in the final amplifier.

Glen, K9STH ______________________________________________________________________________________________

6146 Main Page

HOME PAGE

INTERESTING TUBE FACTS